An Open Letter to JK Rowling

Says it all about the reasons for YES and how the likes of Rowling and the establishment elite either have no concept of what it’s all about or, if they have, are running scared.

Teachers for Yes

JKRowling

by Allan Crosbie, PT English, Edinburgh

Dear Joanne,

You won’t remember me but nearly 20 years ago we worked together briefly in a school in Edinburgh. Your talents have since made you a lot of money and given you considerable status and influence; I have continued to channel mine into that Freirean project of opening minds and changing the world from the classroom. You now have millions of Twitter followers; I have six.

People should always act on their conscience and yours has obviously prompted you to speak out in order to try to prevent Scotland voting for Independence. In doing so over the last few days you have claimed to be speaking not out of self-interest but on behalf of ordinary Scots who, you claim, are set to suffer immeasurably under Independence.

You speak of three kinds of Yes voters – the first are gamblers on oil and blackmailers…

View original post 513 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Austerity: Keeping Ratings Agencies Happy and Controlling People

Austerity.  We heard a lot about that since the Masters of the Universe blew the bloody doors off the world economy in 2008.  It’s sold to us minions, us majority of human beings as being the only solution to balancing the books again; a “we’re all in it together” thatcher-tinaeffort to compensate for the years when “we all it too good”.  You know as if we’d all pigged out over Christmas and were now needing to eat diet meals and go jogging at 06:00 hours.

Except those bastards at the top of the financial food chain never really paid anything post 2008.  We bailed them out.  If you are earning €100K a year and you are out of work for some months and take a 20% pay cut, that’s not pain.  Oh sure, you may need to skip some holidays to Tuscany and maybe even downsize a little bit.  But you’re not going to end up in a sodding food bank or choosing between “eat or heat” for the kids this weekend because DWP has outsourced your claim to a French computer company whose CEO is mats with a UK minister and it’s all gone pear shaped.

Austerity is two things: convincing the ratings agencies you are serious about controlling spending and therefore keeping your AAA credit rating.  And control of people through fear and hopelessness.

Austerity is NOT a means of re-emerging from recession. No country ever “saved” its way back to success.

And does austerity even work?  What does it involve?  It means primarily reducing welfare and public services.  And doing it at the convenient time when banks are refusing to lend money which of course dumps more people on to the lines of jobless.  It also means cutting back on investments in infrastructure and maintenance.

Step back a bit and think it through, folks.  Say you and your family are at home, all out of work and sitting on the couch.  The dole money did not appear on time and it’s Saturday morning and the fridge is empty and the house is a tip.  But you have an allotment full of vegetables.  And you’ve got some cloths and mops.  Now, you can sit there and say we have no money or you can send a couple of you to the allotment while the others clean the place up.

Both options required absolutely no money.  Now I am an experienced engineer and programmer so perhaps I do not qualify for master of the universe status even if I can

See me? I can program one of these things.

See me? I can program one of these things.

program the damn Black-Scholes model, but I fail to see how the hell inflicting austerity on a nation’s internal expenditures can ever salvage a country from recession.  Maynard-Keynes joked about having people dig holes and fill them up again as being a valid model. He qualified this by saying we’d be better off doing something more valuable.

How did the completely bankrupt Nazi Germany manage to build the world’s largest single war machine?  They did it internally.  If a country has the natural resources, the education, aptitude to be self-sufficient as far as makes sense and then exports enough to pay for importing what it cannot or chooses not to do for itself, then you have the option of being a wealthy country.  The country can be exactly as wealthy as it chooses to be.moodys

The UK has imported more than it exports for 30 years in a row.  This means we must essentially borrow foreign currency to keep doing this.  The rate at which we can do this is determined by the ratings agencies.  You know the likes of Moody’s and S&P.  You know the same guys who slapped AAA ratings on toxic sub-prime shit and so long as no one asked the value of the underlying assets the whole charade went on.  Yes those same bastards determine the credit worthiness of countries.  How do they do this?  Simple, the

IDS Yesteday

IDS Yesteday

governments show they are serious about controlling spending.  And what better way of doing this than putting some prick like Iain Duncan Smith up front and proudly proclaiming how he’s slashed payments to elderly, sick and disabled.

The second purpose of austerity is control.  By keeping us in constant fear of our very survival and threatening the reasonably comfy middle class with: “Be good, keep your head down, just accept your massive financial debts. Do that and you won’t end up on a council estate in some mould strewn hovel fending off yobs.”

You get the point.  Trust your own thinking when it comes to finance and economics.  Chances are what you know is far more realistic.

Posted in Economics, Politics, Poverty, Project Fear, United Kingdom | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Independent Scotland is not about Nationalism

The new poll putting Yes ahead for the first time appears to have awoken many people down south.  Maybe some people in the main stream media and elite of society do get it now and this panics them.  And some normal every day folk outside Scotland also get it. But the great majority don’t and we see this in the upturn of talk of it all being about “nationalism”.  The reason the whole Yes campaign has been so peaceful and so positive is because it absolutely is not about nationalism.  In years of studying history and following the evolution of Europe from Cold War era to the capitalist, elite controlled mockery it resembles today, I’ve never seen such a positive and peaceful people.  I don’t know of many nationalists who are so open to welcoming immigrants and wanting to collaborate with our fellow European lands.  Funny people these nationalist Scots.

sugelanduli-wenben

If the normal people throughout Europe and especially in England actually calmly studied what is happening in Scotland they’d be backing independence 100%.  This is a referendum about taking power away from a privileged elite few and putting it in the hands of the many.  People who’ve spent a life passively in front of the TV have got up and got involved in politics and they are not going back to the sofa.  This whole campaign is about saying we’ve had enough of the Neoconservative, Neoliberal agendas and lies. Enough with:

  • warmongering
  • risking world peace and environmental safety on insane weapons
  • austerity
  • boom and bust economy
  • corruption
  • cutting back on our healthcare and education
  • media bias
  • infringements on privacy
  • giant corporations pulling the strings of government
  • untamed destruction of the planet
  • torture
  • selling off of what the public owns at fire sale prices to faceless friends
  • making scapegoats of the weakest and poorest while turning a blind eye to white collar crime
  • sending an 18 year old to jail for stealing one bottle of vodka while bankers who ripped off the whole country return to pre-crisis incomes

In Scotland the ordinary people, the 99% are deciding that this kind of disgraceful, disgusting behaviour has gone on too long.  It did not matter, Labour or Conservative the results were the same.  Now in the UK there are three main parties, probably now four with the rise of UKIP and honestly there is very little between them.  If there was a chance that they could put an end to it via the United Kingdom I’m sure they would have, but after 300 years of this incessant top down, them and us attitude I can safely say that it will never change.  Alex Salmond and Nicola Sturgeon campaign in Glasgow.

Unless something happens.  Like breaking up the Union.  Scotland can afford to go.  It has the massive natural resources, skills and it exports more than it imports.  Politicians and economists try to make it all sound complex but that’s all you need to run a rich country.  And Scotland has it in spades.  So Scotland will make the first move.  And I fully expect that the regions of England and Wales will duly follow demanding at the very least their own assemblies and devolution, all of which will diminish the dominating corrupt power of Westminster further until hopefully it will resemble a democratic parliament.

Posted in Economics, Europe, Independence, Politics, United Kingdom | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Two weeks to save Scotland, UK and Europe

Just two weeks to go until the Scottish referendum.  What more is there to say that has notcommon-logo already been said?  Is there any use in pointing out more Unionist hypocrisy and bullshit?  Probably not, even if it still flows through our biased main stream media completely unabated.

I’ve been talking to some people in my business.  This is an industry that would typically be the home of Conservative voters.  Incredibly Scots are talking about joining Common Weal and hoping that Robin McAlpine will have furbusinessforscotlandlogo_v2ther political aspirations come 19 September.  They believe that a fairer, egalitarian Scotland would be better for everyone, business people included.  The organisation Business for Scotland has done sterling work in this regard.  A market place and job force consisting of large numbers of low income, uneducated people is NOT good for business or society.

But as a Scot based in the Netherlands my thoughts go beyond that of Scotland and the UK.  What would the implications of a No vote be for Europe?  It looks a dead cert that Farage_410438bUKIP will win the Clacton by-election with a landslide.  This in turn makes a Conservative-UKIP coalition a sure thing for 2015.  UKIP has nothing to do with the everyman image that Farage tries to portray with his pint glass glued to his palm.  He’s an ex-banker and his priorities remain with the privileged.  He gathers popular support by focusing on foreigners and blaming them for our ills.  An age old tactic used by despots the world over.  You’d think if we’d been reading our history we’d be aware of this by now.

But in general we don’t read history, much less take it in and ruminate on the matter.  Yes the European Union has its issues and can for certain always be improved.  It has messed up on some major things like accepting all and sundry into the Euro zone.  But – and this is an enormous but – there has been peace between European Union countries for 70 years come 2015, the year of the next UK general election.  This is vitally significant.  It is actually the longest period of peace between Western European nations since Pax Romana, an era that ended in the year AD 180.  That’s what the EU was started for and that’s why we all need to ww2-prisonerremain committed.  With every passing year there are less and less people alive who remember World War II and the actions of populist UK politicians confirm that few people have the imagination to contemplate such horrors.

What is Scotland’s role in all this?  I like to think that Scotland with its focus on collaboration and inclusion can stem the tide of xenophobic thinking in rUK by being a great example of what is possible with a true democratic system.  A system that respects all of its own people and the people of our neighbouring countries.

This referendum has a hell of a lot at stake.  If you are registered to vote in Scotland then please vote very wisely.

Posted in Europe, Independence, United Kingdom | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Survivorship Bias: The Fantasy of Big Time

The Art of Thinking Clearly is a book by Rolf Dobelli.  It claims to be an international bestseller but I’d never seen it along art-of-thinking-clearlyside all the other self-improvement and management guff during my trawls through airport book shops over the years.  Which is unfortunate because it’s a really great book and a refreshing antidote to the positive thinking nonsense that props up much of the Neoconservative, Neoliberal bullshit world we live in.

Dobelli does not pull his punches and wades straight in with the powerful first chapter called “Why you should visit cemeteries”.  It does not turn out quite a morbid as I’d hoped for which would have been more along the lines of sending every politician and corporate alpha-jock to a graveyard and having some sorry looking soul in a stained shell suit yell at them in a thick accent, “Even youse’ll end up in here”, kind of like some of the smarter Roman Emperors did in order to keep their feet on the ground.

No, what Dobelli does is point out that the chances of most endeavours succeeding are way lower than we tend to imagine.  We’re hammered with images of successful musicians, actors, business tycoons and associated hangers-on. Our chances of joining this exclusive set are frighteningly low even if we actually got off our arses and made a go of it.  It’s hard to accept that even the best damn effort in the world is also hugely influenced by dumb luck.  In the book Accidental Empires, Robert X. Cringely (great name) details how one early Silicon Valley success was hinged on whether one single rather brilliant but OCD/ADHD engineer would get around to finishing a product design … once he was done with trying to measure the acoustic reflectivity of the ceiling tiles.  accidental-empires

Conclusion: despite having the idiotic “winner takes all” mentality drilled into us, you should not actually build a high probability of success business, community or nation on the remote chance that you hit it big time*.  You build it piece by piece on a strong foundation that is conducive to incremental progress with the possibility of a breakthrough.  But you do not rely on the breakthrough.  Like discovering unobtainium in them thar hills.  Or selling your soul so a dodgy flavour of the month hard nosed multinational will set up their tax loop hole factory in your backyard.  You make the lot of the average person a comfortable one and make it your priority because that’s exactly what most people are: average.  And there is nothing the hell wrong with that.  With the right leadership and support system average people are capable of incredible things and quite possible a modern, efficient, caring, healthy, highly educated, egalitarian society is the greatest achievement of mankind.

* Of course the modern tycoons and leaders also do not play the high risk, make or break game that they force on the rest of us.  They play a rigged game: lobbying, revolving doors between business and politics, being above the law, and tax payer bailouts.  True capitalism is left to the suckers.

Posted in Business, Economics, Politics, Poverty | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

How does UK compare with Holland? Badly

How does UK compare with Holland?  I’m asked about this once in awhile. To be honest I should be asked this more often by Brits. Because despite the relatively small amount of water between the UK and the Netherlands, the differences are staggering.  Maybe not if you’re a comfortably well off Brit in a village in the shires with your eyes closed to what is happening beyond your comfortable bubble, but I digress.

I’m a Scot who has lived the last 14 years in Holland.  Going back to the UK is a strange experience for me.  On the one hand it’s great to be back in the familiar culture (which had changed to be honest), language, friends and all that, but within a few days it begins to grate and disturb.stock-footage-netherlands-close-up-waving-flag-hd-loop

Sometimes someone in the UK will say to me something like “Yes but you must pay so much tax in Holland.” Well maybe I do pay more than in UK and indeed if your raison d’être is to pay the least amount of tax on your pittance then it may not be the best country.  If however you as an average kind of person want to earn more, live in safety, have a clean environment, have no poverty to deal with or witness (in the UK sense), have smooth road surfaces and an excellent road network, an affordable and reliable train system, be able to bike everywhere on dedicated bike paths, have a proportional representation electoral system, not swing between drought and flooding every six months, have good housing, have good education, have extremely low teenage pregnancy rate, have relatively low drugs problem, have no pensioners freezing to death in winter, etc, etc, then it may just be the country for you.

You see the main stream media in the UK does a good job at keeping the loyal minions in their place by either misreporting news from our European neighbours or simply not reporting at all.  Years ago when I lived in Scotland the only TV programme that consistently reported on Europe was in Gaelic: Eòrpa.

If someone wants to transfer money from UK to me in Holland then with most banks in the UK this is a big issue.  You’ll need to go into the branch and fill out some paper forms. neoliberalism In most of Europe the process for paying someone abroad is IDENTICAL to paying someone around the corner: on-line banking, same IBAN number based system for people at hone and abroad.  Free.  Yes in UK we’re so cut off from the reality it beggars belief.  Phone roaming charges?  EU is normalizing these.  UK lags behind in implementing.

I could go and on.  The point is that the UK feels very backward.  Are the average people genetically different?  No of course not.  The difference is in leadership.  The UK has been run by an elite for hundreds of years that have no interest in the lot of the majority of people.  There is no sense of representing the people or doing what is in the long term best interests of the country.  The super rich are a nation unto themselves, free of borders. eilean-donan

Scotland has the perfect chance to break this stranglehold and demonstrate what a modern, egalitarian country can achieve.  There is no real satisfaction in having an extra few quid in your pocket when the infrastructure and society around you is collapsing.  So I’ll pay my extra few percent taxes in Holland.  It’s not perfect here, nowhere is, and there are many things I miss about the UK, but it truly puts a smile on my face every day that I drive on pot hole free roads, that my wife can ride her bike back from the station safely at midnight and knowing that there are no kids going hungry, cold or suffering from TB and other illnesses that have no place in a modern society.

Vote YES on 18 September and return to a reality where normal folk come first, where a decent, respectful life is the priority and not some every man for himself game of cut-throat survival.

Posted in Business, Europe, Independence, Poverty, United Kingdom | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

The Rise of the Arsehole in Modern Society (Book Review)

Book Review: The Rise of the Arsehole in Modern Society (Scottish Edition) by Daniel Désespéré. Illustrated. 867pp.  D. Watkins Press. €39.99

rise-of-the-arseholeIn what many will come to regard as his tour de force, French academic Professor Daniel Désespéré, charts the rise of idiocy in public life during the late 20th and early 21st century.  Using a mix of manual and computerized research backed by scathingly critical analysis, Désespéré conclusively proves that the intelligence – both intellectual and emotional – of prominent and private figures has been in steep decline in recent decades.

Surprisingly, the obvious inclusion of the likes of Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush is kept brief, their failings in the intellectual realm being so transparent as to hardly warrant a foot note in this hefty 867 page tome.  Désespéré argues that such characters are virtually blissfully unaware of the repercussions of their actions.  To be classified as a true arsehole a certain self-awareness is required; an awareness that is then immediately ignored or projected against a background of an enormous, self-righteous ego.  The true arsehole does not believe God to be on his side, he knows it.  The arsehole can without conscience release a faulty product, bring down a banking system or launch a military attack upon civilians.

Yes, arseholes are to be found in all walks of life from the jobs-worth security guard (“Sportcullis” is the amusing word utilized for such characters in a nod to the hilarious and hitherto unmatched  Not 1982 rip-off calendar) to the wanna-be business tycoon, such as those that grace the set of Dragon’s Den.  The sexing up of entrepreneurship and extreme wealth in the 21st century and the parallel influence of the Self-Improvement industry receives a breathless, almost poetic, 37-page non-stop rant, peppered with the kind of flowery language rarely seen in academia.  How Désespéré pulls this off while remaining credible is nothing short of staggering.

Gaining special attention in the contemporary English speaking world are characters such as Tony Blair, David Cameron, Barack Obama, Nigel Farage, Jamie Dimon, Alan Greenspan and Condoleezza Rice to name just seven.  What arseholes have in common is an overriding sense of their own immortality and importance.  They fail to comprehend that no amount of power or money will ever satisfy the empty rawness at the heart of man.  In a surprising discussion of ancient Eastern philosophy, the global phenomena is brought back to the personal level.  We are all human beings.  We are all mortal.  At heart we want the same things.  We differ in our means of obtaining this inner desire, this balance that we all seek.  Zooming back out Désespéré explores how despite their need for global acknowledgement and importance, top political and business arseholes have little grasp of the interconnectedness of life or the fragility of the planet’s ecosphere or indeed of the vastness of the universe.  It is the void of space that the author leaves us in; leaves us in a state of awe and of having a new view of this world.  Unless you are a total arsehole.

Faults?  The good professor perhaps does not investigate how the balance could be addressed.  What could we do as a society to minimize the destructive force of arseholes?  This is glossed over.  It is also natural to take issue with the claim that this edition of the book is a so called Scottish Edition.  Apparently a search and replace was run on the oft used word “ass hole” and it is replaced by “arsehole”.  Ditto words like “shit” and “shite”. Furthermore a few Scottish case studies are thrown in with Johann Lamont and Alistair Darling being a rather obvious attempt to cash in on the numerous intellectual pro-independence supporters that may elect to purchase the book in the run up to the referendum.  Interestingly Désespéré is a firm believer in independence for Scotland and in a candid foot note apparently claims that such a split in the United Kingdom may indeed signal a decline in the relentless rise of the arsehole.

Highly recommended.

 

Posted in Business, Economics, Independence, Politics, Project Fear, Review, United Kingdom | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Why can’t you plebs just behave?

Why can’t you plebs just behave?  This must surely be the line of thought of the politicians and business leaders throughout the world.  If everyone would just quietly toe the line there would be no need for trouble.

Thrown out of Commonwealth Games pool for having a Yes badge

Thrown out of Commonwealth Games pool for having a Yes badge

  • Why can’t everyone just use the internet for buying our crap and sharing pictures of their cats?
  • Why can’t you just sit at home and watch X-Factor instead of protesting about media bias?
  • Why can’t these Palestinians just quietly die of a mysterious illness?
  • Why doesn’t the whole world follow USA’s lead and give 100% support to Israel?
  • Why do the Scots need to go upsetting the United part of the UK?
  • Why do people use the internet for bypassing the main stream media?
  • Why do you object to us monitoring your every action?  Surely you have nothing to hide?  You wouldn’t have a problem if you just behaved yourself?
  • Why do you need to wear a discrete Yes badge at the Commonwealth Games? Yes we know the Union Jack is not a flag of a competing nation and it is also not allowed officially, but come on, we need to keep the Queen happy and not break Cameron’s heart.
  • Why don’t all you plebs politely remain consumers on internet and not attempt to produce and disseminate information?
  • Why don’t you all trust us that the Neocon, Neoliberal agenda is the only option?  That as Queen Thatcher said, There Is No Alternative?

    thatcher-tina

    Queen Thatcher: TINA

  • Why don’t you all play along and understand that while Trickle Down Economics may not work for you, it works bloody well for us and hey if you can spell Trickle Down then you are probably not living too badly, so what do you care for if others are?
  • Why don’t you take laissez-faire to heart?  Do whatever the hell is in your own best interests, don’t give a flier about anyone else and trust the market will moderate the extremes?
  • Why can’t you trust us that the environment will be all right by itself, that a solution will present itself without changing our lifestyle.
  • Why don’t you all just do what you are told?!
Posted in Business, Economics, Ethics, Independence, Politics, United Kingdom | Leave a comment

Preserving Ourselves and the Status Quo

Why do otherwise intelligent and decent human beings begin to act in a certain pro-establishment, Neoconservative way that smacks of a new world order and secret g20-g8Bilderberg group meetings?  Are the multitudes of journalists, editors, businessmen, politicians, broadcasters, civil servants given a handbook telling them the rules of a modern right wing state?  Not likely. I’m not one for conspiracy theories.

How does the BBC with its thousands of employees manage to overlook demonstrations on its own doorstep?  Or 50000 people protesting against austerity in London?  How does the mainstream media avoid any genuine pro-Scottish independence grass roots organizations, but picks up a one day old astroturf campaign and runs with the story all day?  How do they manage to ignore the criminal activities of Israel, or water it down?  How can an MP be suspended for speaking his mind regarding understanding for the Palestinians?  How can a British ex-ambassador be black listed from appearing on the BBC?  bbc

There is in general no book of rules.  In general there is no one explicitly telling someone else this is how we report the news.  For the answer it is best to look inwards in the Eastern tradition, instead of outwards.  Are the people with power, with money, even the middle classes with their just enough comfort, not slightly afraid of the alternatives?  We’re all mortgaged to the hilt, the result of insane housing prices.  We’ve got insane tuition fees to pay.  We’re maxed out on credit in the quest to purchase latest gadgets and cars.  We’ve got an image to live up to.  Do we not sense that if we start questioning the ethics of the higher echelons of society that this whole comfortable status quo that we currently inhabit will come tumbling down?

If I start asking too many questions, or deviate too much from the current way of behaving, then am I singling myself out for banishment?  merkel-cameron

If I have to admit that my leaders, my authority figures have got it all wrong, that’s going to cause uncomfortable security for me.  We make a map of the world in our heads – if we learn that the map is inaccurate that is a disconcerting state.

Can we really have an equal society?  Are people innately good or bad.  These lower class people are lazy, uneducated and threatening.  Do we really want to empower them?  Will I become poorer as a result?  Will they form a revolution?

These Muslims are dangerous.  They’re going to out-breed us and take over; send us back to the stone age.  Probably we should control them.  Monitoring all internet traffic, why is that a problem?  I’ve got nothing to hide.  If it makes a safer world, then so what?

eilean-donanSplitting up the United Kingdom?  An independent Scotland?  That could set a worrying precedent for other parts of the UK wanting more authority.  What kind of a message would this send our allies and our enemies if the UK cannot even keep order within its own borders?

And an independent Scotland?  Equality?  Fairness?  Nuclear-free?  Peace loving?  Doing what’s ethically right on the world stage?  Who the hell do we think we are?  Stand up amongst legions of identikit national leaders and say, No, this is not right!  Can we survive without weapons contracts?  Can we survive if others impose trade embargoes on Scotland because of our liberal, democratic stance?  What happens then to my comfortable house, new car, status in society?

It’s not a black and white decision to start supporting the status quo.  It’s a slippery slope,  born of fear, of having too much to lose.

Posted in Business, Ethics, Independence, Politics, United Kingdom | Leave a comment

We’re the Self Preservation Society

The Self Preservation Society was the theme song of the original “Italian Job” film from 1969.  It rings truer now than ever before as the world is plunged into a bizarre global fight over every scrap of comfort and wealth that remains.

It’s evident at all levels. We have the likes of China and France buying up land and resources throughout the third world as if they were Christopher Columbus at Inca’s “R” Us New Year clearance sale.  Then we’ve the oligarchs slipping money to their friends in oligarchs225government to ensure they can scoop up massive wads of national wealth at fire sale prices.  And politicians doing it at their level, eating up political financing in return for votes; or simply cheating on their expenses and not even being punished.  Cannot forget the banks, too.  Blow the world’s financial system to pieces then hoover up an equally big slice of tax money in bail outs, and a few short years later their bonuses are back to pre-crisis levels.

And then there’s us ordinary folk, we’re at it too.  So long as we’re earning more than our neighbour and driving a better car, all is well in the world. And don’t make me pay for those poor, disabled, elderly scroungers!  I am a self made man, only did it on the back of a state financed education, government tax breaks, subsidies and the efforts of my staff and customers.  But except for that I did it all myself.  And I deserve everything I earn.  And why should I pay tax that only goes to support scroungers and foreigners.  I am the creator of wealth!  Nothing wrong with tax for the little people, I mean I need those government contracts.

Media floods us with images of musicians, film stars, celebrity chefs, business tycoons, all screaming this is the way.  Then there is the wanna-be level of TV: X-Factor, Dragon’s Den, lottery shows spouting contradictory messages.  All false icons to be aspired to, all dragonsdenfaces with more to do with fantasy than reality, all with this high probability that one day we’ll witness some Jimmy Savile style story emerge on our false idols.

Yes, if we work hard enough, make enough money for ourselves, get famous enough, then elusive contentment, happiness will present itself; never mind how many homeless we must step over outside of our climate controlled fantasy world.

Recently a good friend gave me her reason for voting No to Scottish independence.  She believes that too many Scots are scroungers and wasters and we cannot be compared with Scandinavia.  My response was to ask how that leads to a choice for nuclear weapons, gross inequality, Westminster corruption, illegal wars, short term economic policies, environmental destruction, the list goes on.

There is no direct answer to this.  Because it is more to do with a feeling than a concrete belief.  It’s not that No voters, Scottish unionists, are endeared with Westminster.  No, they are not really any more happy with the politicians down there than the ardent Yes supporters.  It took me some time to understand and it is this:  The fairness and equality of scotland-flagthe Scotland that Salmond, Sturgeon and the pro-independence supporters want to build is not actually seen as a positive case to large numbers of people, possibly the majority of people in Scotland.

The thought that we are all responsible for the rampant poverty in Scotland and that we’ll all need to finance its eradication is a frightening one for many.  The thought that we may need to reject policies being implemented wholesale throughout the western world – nuclear power, anti-terrorism, war, plundering of resources, buoying up of casino banking, surveillance, reduction of liberties, xenophobia – is also frightening.  Nuclear power is unsafe.  Nuclear weapons are insane. Environmental destruction is unsustainable.  Driving a wedge between rich and poor is a recipe for a USA style, manic, unstable society.  We know all this, but there is something appealing in this familiar madness.

Of course when you boil it down even further you come to a rather disturbing truth: we do not believe all people are born equal.  This is the stuff of genocide, it makes uncomfortable reading and thinking.  Can someone vocally admit that they will vote No to Scottish Independence because they believe there is a large element of Scottish society that they do not believe can ever be “saved”?  These poor untouchables must be kept at arm’s length, suitably up4punished to keep them in their place.  And who better to do this than the Westminster psychopaths with their elitist, privileged backgrounds?  They’ve hundreds of years of experience at dominating colonies, developing slavery, concentration camps, divide and rule, genocide.  Some dreamer like Salmond thinks he can make a fairer and more equal society when there are so many hopeless, A housing estate in Glasgowwork-shy, illiterate, sub-humans in Scotland?  Can Salmond not see that they are genetically different?  We’re middle class, we’re still doing all right.  And what about the same lower class inbreds in foreign lands, especially those of dark skin or from Eastern Europe.  Salmond’s going to let them all march right in here and then help them too!  Westminster may be a festering pit of corruption and warmongering but they’re the best bet for self-preservation.

Scotland may be a very small land.  But at this time and place in history, this independence referendum raises global questions that go the heart of ethics and the human condition.

Posted in Ethics, Politics, Poverty | 2 Comments